
EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:

Xeon w5-2555X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2175.6% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ❌27% higher power demand at 320W vs 252W.
Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,859 less on MSRP ($1,069 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 360.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 252W instead of 320W, a 68W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,638 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 9184X
2023Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2175.6% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,859 less on MSRP ($1,069 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 360.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 252W instead of 320W, a 68W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ❌27% higher power demand at 320W vs 252W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,638 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-2555X better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 632 FPS | 1191 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 1136 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 953 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 859 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 420 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 958 FPS | 1191 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 982 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 1023 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 733 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9184X and Xeon w5-2555X

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

Xeon w5-2555X
Xeon w5-2555X
The Xeon w5-2555X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 252 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 47,638 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2555X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 9184X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2555X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2555X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 9184X is built on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the Xeon w5-2555X's 47,638 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon w5-2555X.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+14% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz+8% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+2176% | 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 47,638 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2555X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2555X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2555X) — the EPYC 9184X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and W790 (Xeon w5-2555X).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-2555X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2555X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon w5-2555X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9184X launched at $4928 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-2555X debuted at $1069. On MSRP ($4928 vs $1069), the Xeon w5-2555X is $3859 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2555X — making the Xeon w5-2555X the 128.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $1069-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 44.6+360% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













