
EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:

EPYC Embedded 8224P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 768 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,869).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 320W vs 160W.
EPYC Embedded 8224P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $4,073 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 490.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 320W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 9184X
2023EPYC Embedded 8224P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 768 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $4,073 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 490.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 320W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,869).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 320W vs 160W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 128 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 858 FPS |
| medium | 632 FPS | 771 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 745 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 668 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 250 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 958 FPS | 1018 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 908 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 770 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 824 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9184X and EPYC Embedded 8224P

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

EPYC Embedded 8224P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 33.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz+39% | 2.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 48,869+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 9184X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+433% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 12+100% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9184X launched at $4928 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855. On MSRP ($4928 vs $855), the EPYC Embedded 8224P is $4073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 142.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $855-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 57.2+490% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













