
EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,756).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,129 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9184X
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,129 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,756).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 262 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 632 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 958 FPS | 1200 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 911 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 806 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9184X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9184X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 3.55 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz | 4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1100% | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 48,756+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9184X versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the EPYC 9184X supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+200% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9184X launched at $4928 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX debuted at $799. On MSRP ($4928 vs $799), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is $4129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 145.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $799-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 61.0+529% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












