EPYC 9184X vs Xeon Gold 6342

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9184X

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 6342

24 Cores48 Thrd230 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9184X

16 / 32

47,665

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6342

24 / 48

47,076

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6342 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
❌39.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 230W.

Xeon Gold 6342

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Draws 230W instead of 320W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (47,076 vs 47,665).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Xeon Gold 6342

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Draws 230W instead of 320W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6342 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
❌39.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 230W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (47,076 vs 47,665).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6342 better than EPYC 9184X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6342 is ahead with a 9.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9184X pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. EPYC 9184X also has the bigger cache pool with 2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9184X is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6342 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6342 is $1,951 cheaper on MSRP at $2,977 MSRP versus $4,928 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9184X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 63.5% better value on MSRP (15.8 vs 9.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9184X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9184X Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6342 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
1080p
low	169 FPS	187 FPS
medium	138 FPS	150 FPS
high	118 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	155 FPS
medium	119 FPS	121 FPS
high	96 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	73 FPS
medium	59 FPS	60 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Xeon Gold 6342

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
1080p
low	576 FPS	416 FPS
medium	504 FPS	364 FPS
high	409 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	484 FPS	357 FPS
medium	431 FPS	317 FPS
high	360 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	204 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	221 FPS
medium	271 FPS	200 FPS
high	244 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	136 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Xeon Gold 6342

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
1080p
low	746 FPS	986 FPS
medium	632 FPS	859 FPS
high	575 FPS	812 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	720 FPS
1440p
low	557 FPS	787 FPS
medium	470 FPS	676 FPS
high	420 FPS	639 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	567 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	504 FPS
medium	321 FPS	397 FPS
high	284 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	288 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Xeon Gold 6342

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
1080p
low	958 FPS	911 FPS
medium	867 FPS	828 FPS
high	738 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	653 FPS	615 FPS
1440p
low	754 FPS	712 FPS
medium	657 FPS	625 FPS
high	556 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	481 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	534 FPS	514 FPS
medium	477 FPS	459 FPS
high	420 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	359 FPS	351 FPS

Open EPYC 9184X Open Xeon Gold 6342

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9184X and Xeon Gold 6342

EPYC 9184X

The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

Xeon Gold 6342

The Xeon Gold 6342 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 230 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 47,076 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6342 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6342 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6342 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the Xeon Gold 6342's 47,076 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6342.

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.55 GHz+27%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+2033%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	47,665+1%	47,076

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9184X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6342 — the EPYC 9184X supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6342). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6342) — the EPYC 9184X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6342).

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	6144
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6342). Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon Gold 6342 rivals EPYC 7443.

Feature	EPYC 9184X	Xeon Gold 6342
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9184X launched at $4928 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6342 debuted at $2977. On MSRP ($4928 vs $2977), the Xeon Gold 6342 is $1951 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6342 — making the Xeon Gold 6342 the 48.2% better value option.