
Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4116.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,918).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4116.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,918).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Silver 4116


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 1700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB | 16.5 MB (total)+3% |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,772 | 14,918 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,065 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












