
Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4215R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4215R.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4215R across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4215R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4215R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,683 vs 14,772).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Xeon Silver 4215R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4215R.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4215R across 23 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4215R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,683 vs 14,772).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1700 better than Xeon Silver 4215R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Silver 4215R


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4215R
Xeon Silver 4215R
The Xeon Silver 4215R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,683 points. Launch price was $794.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Silver 4215R share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215R — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4215R (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon Silver 4215R's 14,683 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215R.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+45% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | 8 MB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,772 | 14,683 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,065 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4215R). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












