Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon D-1733NT

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon D-1733NT

8 Cores16 Thrd53 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 113.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1733NT.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,849).
  • 22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1700 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1733NT better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1733NT is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon D-1733NT is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 1700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon D-1733NT is 114.3% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 1700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 1700 is also 113.2% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 49.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1733NT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low168 FPS177 FPS
medium144 FPS144 FPS
high117 FPS117 FPS
ultra95 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS143 FPS
medium119 FPS114 FPS
high94 FPS90 FPS
ultra76 FPS71 FPS
4K
low64 FPS68 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra36 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low277 FPS159 FPS
medium245 FPS139 FPS
high219 FPS124 FPS
ultra180 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low244 FPS139 FPS
medium221 FPS126 FPS
high197 FPS113 FPS
ultra162 FPS90 FPS
4K
low177 FPS101 FPS
medium165 FPS94 FPS
high151 FPS83 FPS
ultra120 FPS65 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low369 FPS371 FPS
medium369 FPS371 FPS
high369 FPS371 FPS
ultra369 FPS371 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS371 FPS
medium369 FPS371 FPS
high367 FPS371 FPS
ultra311 FPS345 FPS
4K
low350 FPS371 FPS
medium284 FPS322 FPS
high258 FPS274 FPS
ultra209 FPS220 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low369 FPS371 FPS
medium369 FPS371 FPS
high369 FPS371 FPS
ultra369 FPS371 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS371 FPS
medium369 FPS371 FPS
high369 FPS371 FPS
ultra369 FPS371 FPS
4K
low369 FPS371 FPS
medium369 FPS371 FPS
high361 FPS358 FPS
ultra311 FPS309 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon D-1733NT

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon D-1733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1733NT. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+19%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB+7%
15 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
14,772
14,849
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,065
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
Socket
AM4
FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon D-1733NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 1700 launched at $140 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1733NT debuted at $300. On MSRP ($140 vs $300), the Ryzen 7 1700 is $160 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Ryzen 7 1700 the 72.3% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP
$140-53%
$300
Performance per Dollar
105.5+113%
49.5
Release Date
2017
2022