
Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1733NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1733NT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,849).
- ❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.
Xeon D-1733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1700 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Xeon D-1733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1733NT.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,849).
- ❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1700 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1733NT better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon D-1733NT


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon D-1733NT
Xeon D-1733NT
The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon D-1733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1733NT. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+7% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 14,772 | 14,849 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,065 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon D-1733NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 1700 launched at $140 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1733NT debuted at $300. On MSRP ($140 vs $300), the Ryzen 7 1700 is $160 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Ryzen 7 1700 the 72.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Xeon D-1733NT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-53% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.5+113% | 49.5 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












