
Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,777).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,777).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 285 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,777 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (base: 3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U's 14,777 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+76% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 14,772 | 14,777 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,065 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












