
Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,772).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,772).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1700 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,772 | 14,699 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,065 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 1700 launched at $140 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($140 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 1700 is $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 7 1700 the 81% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-57% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.5+136% | 44.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












