Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $189 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • Delivers 136.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,772).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 1700 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is ahead with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 1700 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 1700 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 1700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 1700 is $189 cheaper on MSRP at $140 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 136.2% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 44.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 1700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low168 FPS176 FPS
medium144 FPS154 FPS
high117 FPS127 FPS
ultra95 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS145 FPS
medium119 FPS121 FPS
high94 FPS97 FPS
ultra76 FPS78 FPS
4K
low64 FPS66 FPS
medium58 FPS59 FPS
high46 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low277 FPS286 FPS
medium245 FPS253 FPS
high219 FPS226 FPS
ultra180 FPS186 FPS
1440p
low244 FPS253 FPS
medium221 FPS229 FPS
high197 FPS203 FPS
ultra162 FPS167 FPS
4K
low177 FPS183 FPS
medium165 FPS170 FPS
high151 FPS156 FPS
ultra120 FPS124 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low369 FPS367 FPS
medium369 FPS367 FPS
high369 FPS367 FPS
ultra369 FPS367 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS367 FPS
medium369 FPS367 FPS
high367 FPS367 FPS
ultra311 FPS319 FPS
4K
low350 FPS363 FPS
medium284 FPS295 FPS
high258 FPS264 FPS
ultra209 FPS214 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low369 FPS367 FPS
medium369 FPS367 FPS
high369 FPS367 FPS
ultra369 FPS367 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS367 FPS
medium369 FPS367 FPS
high369 FPS367 FPS
ultra369 FPS367 FPS
4K
low369 FPS367 FPS
medium369 FPS367 FPS
high361 FPS363 FPS
ultra311 FPS313 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
14,772
14,699
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,065
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Socket
AM4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 1700 launched at $140 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($140 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 1700 is $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 7 1700 the 81% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP
$140-57%
$329
Performance per Dollar
105.5+136%
44.7
Release Date
2017
2017