Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4116

12 Cores24 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4116.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,918).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

  • 30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4116 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 17 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4116 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 1700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Silver 4116 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 1700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 1700 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low168 FPS167 FPS
medium144 FPS133 FPS
high117 FPS108 FPS
ultra95 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS139 FPS
medium119 FPS109 FPS
high94 FPS87 FPS
ultra76 FPS68 FPS
4K
low64 FPS65 FPS
medium58 FPS55 FPS
high46 FPS43 FPS
ultra36 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low277 FPS141 FPS
medium245 FPS124 FPS
high219 FPS113 FPS
ultra180 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low244 FPS124 FPS
medium221 FPS112 FPS
high197 FPS101 FPS
ultra162 FPS80 FPS
4K
low177 FPS90 FPS
medium165 FPS84 FPS
high151 FPS74 FPS
ultra120 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low369 FPS373 FPS
medium369 FPS373 FPS
high369 FPS373 FPS
ultra369 FPS373 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS373 FPS
medium369 FPS373 FPS
high367 FPS373 FPS
ultra311 FPS373 FPS
4K
low350 FPS373 FPS
medium284 FPS367 FPS
high258 FPS325 FPS
ultra209 FPS266 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
1080p
low369 FPS373 FPS
medium369 FPS373 FPS
high369 FPS373 FPS
ultra369 FPS373 FPS
1440p
low369 FPS373 FPS
medium369 FPS373 FPS
high369 FPS373 FPS
ultra369 FPS373 FPS
4K
low369 FPS373 FPS
medium369 FPS373 FPS
high361 FPS373 FPS
ultra311 FPS334 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Silver 4116

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 1700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+23%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB
16.5 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache
4096 kB+300%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
14,772
14,918
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,065
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700Xeon Silver 4116
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation