
Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,772).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5625U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5625U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,772).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 311 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Ryzen 7 1700


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 1700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 15% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+16% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16384 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,717 | 14,772 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,065 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












