Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon E5-2658A V3

AMD

Ryzen 5 5625U

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2658A V3

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5625U

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,879).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658A V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2658A V3

2015

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,832 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Xeon E5-2658A V3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2658A V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5625U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2658A V3 is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5625U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2658A V3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 5625U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,832 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2658A V3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2658A V3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5625U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
1080p
low172 FPS160 FPS
medium146 FPS138 FPS
high118 FPS112 FPS
ultra97 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low147 FPS134 FPS
medium123 FPS113 FPS
high99 FPS89 FPS
ultra81 FPS72 FPS
4K
low78 FPS62 FPS
medium71 FPS56 FPS
high56 FPS44 FPS
ultra44 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
1080p
low318 FPS193 FPS
medium276 FPS175 FPS
high249 FPS151 FPS
ultra216 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low282 FPS167 FPS
medium250 FPS153 FPS
high229 FPS134 FPS
ultra197 FPS109 FPS
4K
low222 FPS109 FPS
medium200 FPS101 FPS
high186 FPS89 FPS
ultra158 FPS71 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
1080p
low368 FPS372 FPS
medium368 FPS372 FPS
high368 FPS372 FPS
ultra368 FPS366 FPS
1440p
low368 FPS372 FPS
medium368 FPS372 FPS
high360 FPS372 FPS
ultra299 FPS330 FPS
4K
low338 FPS372 FPS
medium284 FPS316 FPS
high247 FPS281 FPS
ultra191 FPS232 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
1080p
low368 FPS372 FPS
medium368 FPS372 FPS
high368 FPS372 FPS
ultra368 FPS372 FPS
1440p
low368 FPS372 FPS
medium368 FPS372 FPS
high368 FPS372 FPS
ultra368 FPS372 FPS
4K
low368 FPS372 FPS
medium368 FPS372 FPS
high365 FPS372 FPS
ultra315 FPS324 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Xeon E5-2658A V3

AMD

Ryzen 5 5625U

The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2658A V3

The Xeon E5-2658A V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,879 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2658A V3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658A V3 — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Xeon E5-2658A V3's 14,879 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2658A V3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658A V3.

FeatureRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+48%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+5%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
14,717
14,879+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2658A V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
Socket
FP6
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2658A V3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2658A V3 targets Server.

FeatureRyzen 5 5625UXeon E5-2658A V3
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server