
Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2680 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,864).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2680 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Xeon E5-2680 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,864).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Xeon E5-2680 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 268 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Xeon E5-2680 v3


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2680 v3
Xeon E5-2680 v3
The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Xeon E5-2680 v3's 14,864 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 14,717 | 14,864 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2680 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












