
Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4215R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4215R, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Silver 4215R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,683 vs 14,717).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Xeon Silver 4215R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4215R, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,683 vs 14,717).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Xeon Silver 4215R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Xeon Silver 4215R


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4215R
Xeon Silver 4215R
The Xeon Silver 4215R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,683 points. Launch price was $794.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4215R offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4215R has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Xeon Silver 4215R's 14,683 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5625U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215R.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+45% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,717 | 14,683 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Xeon Silver 4215R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












