
Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,717).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 14,717).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 15% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5625U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+16% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,717 | 14,699 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5625U | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












