Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon E5-2683 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5625U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon E5-2683 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 14,717).
❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.

Ryzen 5 5625U

2022

Xeon E5-2683 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 14,717).
❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Xeon E5-2683 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2683 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5625U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5625U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5625U is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5625U still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 5625U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5625U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5625U Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2683 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon E5-2683 v3
1080p
low	172 FPS	174 FPS
medium	146 FPS	151 FPS
high	118 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	146 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	68 FPS
medium	71 FPS	61 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5625U Open Xeon E5-2683 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon E5-2683 v3
1080p
low	318 FPS	212 FPS
medium	276 FPS	193 FPS
high	249 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	282 FPS	183 FPS
medium	250 FPS	166 FPS
high	229 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	115 FPS
medium	200 FPS	106 FPS
high	186 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5625U Open Xeon E5-2683 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon E5-2683 v3
1080p
low	368 FPS	367 FPS
medium	368 FPS	367 FPS
high	368 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	368 FPS	367 FPS
medium	368 FPS	367 FPS
high	360 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	367 FPS
medium	284 FPS	358 FPS
high	247 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	269 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5625U Open Xeon E5-2683 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon E5-2683 v3
1080p
low	368 FPS	367 FPS
medium	368 FPS	367 FPS
high	368 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	368 FPS	367 FPS
medium	368 FPS	367 FPS
high	368 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	368 FPS	367 FPS
medium	368 FPS	367 FPS
high	365 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	315 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5625U Open Xeon E5-2683 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5625U and Xeon E5-2683 v3

Ryzen 5 5625U

The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2683 v3

The Xeon E5-2683 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,686 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v3 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Xeon E5-2683 v3's 14,686 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5625U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2683 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon E5-2683 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+43%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	35 MB (total)+119%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	14,717	14,686

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.