
EPYC 7543P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7543P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 545.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
EPYC 7543P
2021Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 545.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 7543P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 763 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 490 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7543P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7543P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 66,590 | 67,561+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7543P versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 7543P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7543P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7543P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($2730 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $2301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 146.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $429-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 157.5+545% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












