
EPYC 7543P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7543P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 66,614).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
EPYC 7543P
2021Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 66,614).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 7543P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 655 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1215 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 926 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 820 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 763 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 490 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7543P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7543P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 66,590 | 66,614 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 45,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7543P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 7543P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7543P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7543P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($2730 vs $2399), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 12.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $2399-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 27.8+14% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












