EPYC 7543P vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7543P

32 Cores64 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7543P

32 / 64

66,590

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 / 64

68,643

+3.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7543P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,265 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 68,643).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 205W instead of 225W, a 20W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7543P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

EPYC 7543P

2021

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,265 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 205W instead of 225W, a 20W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 68,643).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7543P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8352Y better than EPYC 7543P?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 7543P is ahead with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y pulls ahead with 3.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7543P also has the bigger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the better fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8352Y is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7543P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8352Y is 46.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,995 MSRP versus $2,730 MSRP, and it gives you 3.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 7543P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7543P is also 42.0% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7543P Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8352Y Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	198 FPS	189 FPS
medium	161 FPS	152 FPS
high	129 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	161 FPS	154 FPS
medium	126 FPS	120 FPS
high	98 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	72 FPS
medium	61 FPS	60 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	507 FPS	233 FPS
medium	443 FPS	208 FPS
high	354 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	199 FPS
medium	373 FPS	181 FPS
high	308 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	124 FPS
medium	234 FPS	115 FPS
high	205 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	82 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	850 FPS	969 FPS
medium	705 FPS	848 FPS
high	657 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	580 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	612 FPS	775 FPS
medium	506 FPS	669 FPS
high	464 FPS	632 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	561 FPS
4K
low	437 FPS	498 FPS
medium	339 FPS	393 FPS
high	303 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	285 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	992 FPS	893 FPS
medium	900 FPS	811 FPS
high	775 FPS	697 FPS
ultra	671 FPS	599 FPS
1440p
low	763 FPS	699 FPS
medium	665 FPS	613 FPS
high	569 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	490 FPS	449 FPS
4K
low	547 FPS	504 FPS
medium	488 FPS	451 FPS
high	428 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	343 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and Xeon Platinum 8352Y

EPYC 7543P

The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7543P and Xeon Platinum 8352Y share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 8.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7543P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7543P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+27%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+433%	48 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	—
PassMark	66,590	68,643+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7543P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 7543P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7543P	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y debuted at $3995. On MSRP ($2730 vs $3995), the EPYC 7543P is $1265 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the EPYC 7543P the 34.7% better value option.