
EPYC 7543P
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-2595X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7543P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+425.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 49 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $691 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,049 vs 66,590).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 7543P
2021Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+425.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 49 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $691 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,049 vs 66,590).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than EPYC 7543P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 1219 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 1113 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 928 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 410 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1124 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 1007 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 881 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 783 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 763 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 490 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and Xeon w7-2595X

EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.

Xeon w7-2595X
Xeon w7-2595X
The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7543P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the EPYC 7543P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7543P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+23% | 26 / 52 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+425% | 48.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 66,590 | 66,049 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 48,442 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,436 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,758 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7543P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2595X — the EPYC 7543P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7543P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7543P) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7543P) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the EPYC 7543P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-2595X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-2595X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7543P) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2595X debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($2730 vs $2039), the Xeon w7-2595X is $691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Xeon w7-2595X the 28.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $2039-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 32.4+33% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













