
EPYC 7543P
Popular choices:

EPYC 7573X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7543P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,860 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 69,432).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+4.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
EPYC 7543P
2021EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,860 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+4.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 69,432).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7543P better than EPYC 7573X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 668 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 992 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 900 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 763 FPS | 767 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 490 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and EPYC 7573X

EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.

EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7543P and EPYC 7573X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7543P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7573X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the EPYC 7573X's 69,432 — a 4.2% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Milan-X (2022) |
| PassMark | 66,590 | 69,432+4% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and SP3 (EPYC 7573X).
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the EPYC 7573X debuted at $5590. On MSRP ($2730 vs $5590), the EPYC 7543P is $2860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7573X — making the EPYC 7543P the 65% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730-51% | $5590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4+97% | 12.4 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













