
EPYC 7543P
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8571N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7543P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 68,385).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,131 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 368.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
EPYC 7543P
2021Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,131 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 368.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,590 vs 68,385).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 7543P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1036 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 917 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 674 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 763 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 490 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and Xeon Platinum 8571N

EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.

Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7543P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 52 / 104+63% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 66,590 | 68,385+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 60,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7543P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the EPYC 7543P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7543P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 7543P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($2730 vs $599), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $2131 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 129.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7543P | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $599-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 114.2+368% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













