PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7543P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 225W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7543P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 66,590).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

EPYC 7543P

2021

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Draws 210W instead of 225W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7543P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 66,590).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7543P better than EPYC 9334?

Yes. EPYC 7543P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7543P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7543P is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7543P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7543P is $260 cheaper on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.2% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7543P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	198 FPS	170 FPS
medium	161 FPS	141 FPS
high	129 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	161 FPS	148 FPS
medium	126 FPS	120 FPS
high	98 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	70 FPS
medium	61 FPS	59 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open EPYC 9334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	507 FPS	533 FPS
medium	443 FPS	465 FPS
high	354 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	438 FPS
medium	373 FPS	392 FPS
high	308 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	270 FPS
medium	234 FPS	246 FPS
high	205 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open EPYC 9334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	850 FPS	646 FPS
medium	705 FPS	538 FPS
high	657 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	580 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	612 FPS	502 FPS
medium	506 FPS	417 FPS
high	464 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	437 FPS	374 FPS
medium	339 FPS	291 FPS
high	303 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open EPYC 9334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	992 FPS	856 FPS
medium	900 FPS	786 FPS
high	775 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	671 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	763 FPS	689 FPS
medium	665 FPS	605 FPS
high	569 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	490 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	547 FPS	494 FPS
medium	488 FPS	445 FPS
high	428 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	336 FPS

Open EPYC 7543P Open EPYC 9334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7543P and EPYC 9334

EPYC 7543P

The EPYC 7543P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,590 points. Launch price was $2,730.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7543P and EPYC 9334 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7543P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9334 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7543P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7543P scores 66,590 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 7543P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7543P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	66,590+2%	65,568

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7543P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7543P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7543P) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7543P) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7543P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 7543P	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7543P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($2730 vs $2990), the EPYC 7543P is $260 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7543P delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 7543P the 10.6% better value option.