
Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,528).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Xeon E5-2695 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,528).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1800X better than Xeon E5-2695 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon E5-2695 v3


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon E5-2695 v3
Xeon E5-2695 v3
The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,528 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 1800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon E5-2695 v3's 16,528 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v3. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB | 35 MB (total)+119% |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 16,305 | 16,528+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,314 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-2695 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











