
Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4650 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,305).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,305).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1800X better than Xeon E5-4650 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon E5-4650 v4


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon E5-4650 v4
Xeon E5-4650 v4
The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $3,838.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 1800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v4 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon E5-4650 v4's 16,225 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4650 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+43% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB | 35 MB+119% |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+14% | 3.5 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 16,305 | 16,225 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,314 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











