PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 1800X

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,715 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 337.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,519).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6134, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Ryzen 7 1800X

2017

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,715 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 337.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,519).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6134, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6134 better than Ryzen 7 1800X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1800X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6134 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6134 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6134 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 1800X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 6134 is 343.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,214 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 1800X is also 337.9% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6134 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6134 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	213 FPS	179 FPS
medium	178 FPS	143 FPS
high	143 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	178 FPS	145 FPS
medium	146 FPS	113 FPS
high	115 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	67 FPS
medium	61 FPS	56 FPS
high	48 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 1800X Open Xeon Gold 6134

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	284 FPS	400 FPS
medium	251 FPS	346 FPS
high	222 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	251 FPS	346 FPS
medium	227 FPS	307 FPS
high	200 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	182 FPS	225 FPS
medium	169 FPS	200 FPS
high	154 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	148 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 1800X Open Xeon Gold 6134

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	408 FPS	413 FPS
medium	408 FPS	413 FPS
high	408 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	413 FPS
1440p
low	408 FPS	413 FPS
medium	408 FPS	413 FPS
high	391 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	413 FPS
medium	310 FPS	369 FPS
high	277 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	267 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 1800X Open Xeon Gold 6134

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	408 FPS	413 FPS
medium	408 FPS	413 FPS
high	408 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	413 FPS
1440p
low	408 FPS	413 FPS
medium	408 FPS	413 FPS
high	408 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	408 FPS	413 FPS
medium	408 FPS	413 FPS
high	407 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	353 FPS	351 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 1800X Open Xeon Gold 6134

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon Gold 6134

Ryzen 7 1800X

The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6134. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16384 kB	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	4096 kB	8 MB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,305	16,519+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,314	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,130	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6134 — the Xeon Gold 6134 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6134 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 1800X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6134). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 1800X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6134) — the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM4 (Ryzen 7 1800X) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6134).

Feature	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+17476167%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 1800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6134 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1800X	Xeon Gold 6134
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 1800X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6134 debuted at $2214. On MSRP ($499 vs $2214), the Ryzen 7 1800X is $1715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1800X delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Ryzen 7 1800X the 125.6% better value option.