Ryzen 7 1800X vs Xeon 6325P

AMD

Ryzen 7 1800X

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6325P

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 1800X

2017

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,346).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • 72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6325P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $218 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 78.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.2 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6325P better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6325P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1800X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6325P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6325P is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6325P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6325P is $218 cheaper on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 78.0% better value on MSRP (58.2 vs 32.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6325P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
1080p
low213 FPS257 FPS
medium178 FPS232 FPS
high143 FPS194 FPS
ultra105 FPS167 FPS
1440p
low178 FPS230 FPS
medium146 FPS189 FPS
high115 FPS153 FPS
ultra84 FPS135 FPS
4K
low70 FPS159 FPS
medium61 FPS133 FPS
high48 FPS102 FPS
ultra38 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
1080p
low284 FPS327 FPS
medium251 FPS270 FPS
high222 FPS243 FPS
ultra182 FPS207 FPS
1440p
low251 FPS273 FPS
medium227 FPS233 FPS
high200 FPS215 FPS
ultra164 FPS181 FPS
4K
low182 FPS204 FPS
medium169 FPS178 FPS
high154 FPS153 FPS
ultra122 FPS125 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
1080p
low408 FPS409 FPS
medium408 FPS409 FPS
high408 FPS409 FPS
ultra408 FPS409 FPS
1440p
low408 FPS409 FPS
medium408 FPS409 FPS
high391 FPS409 FPS
ultra328 FPS409 FPS
4K
low376 FPS409 FPS
medium310 FPS409 FPS
high277 FPS371 FPS
ultra222 FPS312 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
1080p
low408 FPS409 FPS
medium408 FPS409 FPS
high408 FPS409 FPS
ultra408 FPS409 FPS
1440p
low408 FPS409 FPS
medium408 FPS409 FPS
high408 FPS409 FPS
ultra408 FPS409 FPS
4K
low408 FPS409 FPS
medium408 FPS409 FPS
high407 FPS409 FPS
ultra353 FPS357 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon 6325P

AMD

Ryzen 7 1800X

The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon 6325P

The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 1800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 1800X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6325P. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P.

FeatureRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+220%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
16,305
16,346
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,314
Geekbench 6 Single
1,130
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6325P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
Socket
AM4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon 6325P). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.

FeatureRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 1800X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6325P debuted at $281. On MSRP ($499 vs $281), the Xeon 6325P is $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1800X delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 58.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6325P — making the Xeon 6325P the 56.1% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 1800XXeon 6325P
MSRP
$499
$281-44%
Performance per Dollar
32.7
58.2+78%
Release Date
2017
2025