
Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6325P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,346).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.2 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.2 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,346).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6325P better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon 6325P


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P
The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 1800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 1800X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6325P. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+220% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 16,305 | 16,346 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,314 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6325P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon 6325P). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 1800X launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6325P debuted at $281. On MSRP ($499 vs $281), the Xeon 6325P is $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1800X delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 58.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6325P — making the Xeon 6325P the 56.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $281-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.7 | 58.2+78% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











