
Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-4809 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,471).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E7-4809 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Xeon E7-4809 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,305 vs 16,471).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1800X better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon E7-4809 v2


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon E7-4809 v2
Xeon E7-4809 v2
The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 1800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 1800X has 2 more cores. The Ryzen 7 1800X is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E7-4809 v2. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | none |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+89% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+33% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 16,305 | 16,471+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,314 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon E7-4809 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon E7-4809 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











