
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.7% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅81.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅81.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.7% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 113.6%. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 16,995+114% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+207% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1777 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3.5 MB+1742% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 360 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 170W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 100.0+214% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 34.1% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 225.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $329-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 51.7+225% |
| Codename | GK110 | GA106 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #320 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













