Radeon Pro 580 vs Radeon RX 780

AMD

Radeon Pro 580

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 780

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 580

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

  • 46.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Yes. Radeon RX 780 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 780 averages 46.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,658 vs 7,753 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 780 is a 2024 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon Pro 580 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 780 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro 580 is easier to justify on price alone at $500 MSRP, but Radeon RX 780 is still the stronger gaming card overall. Radeon RX 780 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 46.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (7,658 vs 7,753). Radeon Pro 580 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with Radeon RX 780 if you want the better experience; go with Radeon Pro 580 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 580 is still a very good gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Around $500 MSRP, it makes sense if you would rather save money than pay about 0.0% more for the extra performance. If you have more room in the budget, Radeon RX 780 is still the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
1080p
low81 FPS125 FPS
medium69 FPS114 FPS
high58 FPS96 FPS
ultra38 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low71 FPS108 FPS
medium62 FPS92 FPS
high46 FPS77 FPS
ultra29 FPS67 FPS
4K
low25 FPS59 FPS
medium24 FPS51 FPS
high16 FPS41 FPS
ultra14 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
1080p
low184 FPS345 FPS
medium159 FPS276 FPS
high127 FPS230 FPS
ultra101 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS258 FPS
medium109 FPS207 FPS
high89 FPS172 FPS
ultra69 FPS129 FPS
4K
low71 FPS160 FPS
medium61 FPS135 FPS
high50 FPS115 FPS
ultra37 FPS86 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
1080p
low349 FPS345 FPS
medium279 FPS276 FPS
high233 FPS230 FPS
ultra174 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low262 FPS258 FPS
medium209 FPS207 FPS
high174 FPS172 FPS
ultra131 FPS129 FPS
4K
low174 FPS172 FPS
medium140 FPS138 FPS
high116 FPS115 FPS
ultra87 FPS86 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
1080p
low162 FPS323 FPS
medium134 FPS260 FPS
high116 FPS223 FPS
ultra99 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS243 FPS
medium100 FPS203 FPS
high87 FPS170 FPS
ultra73 FPS129 FPS
4K
low67 FPS144 FPS
medium54 FPS126 FPS
high42 FPS102 FPS
ultra33 FPS85 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon RX 780

AMD

Radeon Pro 580

The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2335 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
G3D Mark Score
7,753+1%
7,658
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
3840+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.53 TFLOPS
35.87 TFLOPS+549%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2335 MHz+95%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
144
240+67%
L1 Cache
576 KB
768 KB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR 3 + AFMF

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
DirectX
12.0
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
Encoder
VCE 3.4
RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
Decoder
UVD 6.3
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
TDP
150W-17%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
51.7+22%
42.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. The Radeon RX 780 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 1.3% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro 580Radeon RX 780
MSRP
$500
$499
Performance per Dollar
15.5+1%
15.3
Codename
Polaris 20
Navi 32
Release
June 5 2017
September 11 2024
Ranking
#327
#131