
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌179.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 185.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 185.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌179.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 470/570 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 580 make more sense than Radeon RX 470/570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon RX 470/570

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the Radeon RX 470/570 reaches 7,935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753 | 7,935+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+12% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 120W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7 | 66.1+28% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 64.2% less ($321 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 185.8% better value. The Radeon Pro 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $179-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 44.3+186% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 5 2017 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #327 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












