
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro V520 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon Pro V520

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the Radeon Pro V520 reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753 | 8,000+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7+45% | 35.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800. The Radeon Pro 580 costs 37.5% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 10.0 (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 55% better value. The Radeon Pro V520 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-38% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5+55% | 10.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 12 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #327 | #218 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












