
Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:

T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.
T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 580
2017T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is T1200 Mobile better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580 and T1200 Mobile

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580 scores 7,753 and the T1200 Mobile reaches 7,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,753 | 7,805 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1425 MHz+19% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580) vs 12.1 (T1200 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580) vs NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580 draws 150W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 44.9% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 95W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7 | 82.2+59% |
Value Analysis
The T1200 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | — |
| Release | June 5 2017 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #327 | #325 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













