
Radeon 880M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅73.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Radeon 880M
2024Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅73.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 580 better than Radeon 880M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 880M make more sense than Radeon Pro 580?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and Radeon Pro 580

Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729 | 7,753 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+142% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 576 KB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+897% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Polaris 20 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #329 | #327 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












