Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro 580

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

2016Core: 1140 MHzBoost: 1165 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 580

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M5500

2016

Why buy it

  • 21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 60% HIGHER MSRP
    $800 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 580

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • Delivers 56.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M5500 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Yes. Quadro M5500 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2017, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M5500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro M5500 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M5500 is about 60.0% more expensive on MSRP at $800 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 21.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 580 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon Pro 580 make more sense than Quadro M5500?
Yes. Radeon Pro 580 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M5500. The trade-off is that Quadro M5500 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark and 21.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon Pro 580 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
1080p
low108 FPS81 FPS
medium91 FPS69 FPS
high78 FPS58 FPS
ultra52 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS71 FPS
medium77 FPS62 FPS
high59 FPS46 FPS
ultra38 FPS29 FPS
4K
low36 FPS25 FPS
medium33 FPS24 FPS
high21 FPS16 FPS
ultra18 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
1080p
low229 FPS184 FPS
medium198 FPS159 FPS
high151 FPS127 FPS
ultra120 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low170 FPS132 FPS
medium144 FPS109 FPS
high116 FPS89 FPS
ultra91 FPS69 FPS
4K
low98 FPS71 FPS
medium82 FPS61 FPS
high69 FPS50 FPS
ultra52 FPS37 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
1080p
low356 FPS349 FPS
medium285 FPS279 FPS
high237 FPS233 FPS
ultra178 FPS174 FPS
1440p
low267 FPS262 FPS
medium214 FPS209 FPS
high178 FPS174 FPS
ultra134 FPS131 FPS
4K
low178 FPS174 FPS
medium142 FPS140 FPS
high119 FPS116 FPS
ultra89 FPS87 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
1080p
low234 FPS162 FPS
medium202 FPS134 FPS
high164 FPS116 FPS
ultra140 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low183 FPS119 FPS
medium159 FPS100 FPS
high125 FPS87 FPS
ultra104 FPS73 FPS
4K
low100 FPS67 FPS
medium80 FPS54 FPS
high63 FPS42 FPS
ultra50 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5500 and Radeon Pro 580

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 580

The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
G3D Mark Score
7,915+2%
7,753
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.772 TFLOPS
5.53 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1200 MHz+3%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128
144+13%
L1 Cache
768 KB+33%
576 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
Encoder
NVENC (Maxwell)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC (Maxwell)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
52.8+2%
51.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M5500 launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 580 costs 37.5% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro M5500) vs 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 56.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M5500Radeon Pro 580
MSRP
$800
$500-38%
Performance per Dollar
9.9
15.5+57%
Codename
GM204
Polaris 20
Release
April 8 2016
June 5 2017
Ranking
#321
#327