
Quadro M5500
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro M5500
2016Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M5500 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 580 make more sense than Quadro M5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5500 and Radeon Pro 580

Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,915+2% | 7,753 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.772 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1165 MHz | 1200 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Maxwell) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+2% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M5500 launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 580 costs 37.5% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro M5500) vs 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 56.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $500-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 15.5+57% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #321 | #327 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













