
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5700M make more sense than Quadro P5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon RX 5700M

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+12% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #206 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












