
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌524.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,099 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 538.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,099 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 538.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌524.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600S better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon RX 6600S

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,016+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+24% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2000 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S has 4 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 80W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 162.7+130% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. The Radeon RX 6600S costs 84% less ($2099 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon RX 6600S offers 537.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6600S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $400-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 32.5+537% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #206 | #200 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












