
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,130+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584 ×2+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+16% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 75% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 28 GB+75% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 13% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 158W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 83.1+18% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #206 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












