Quadro P5000 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017Core: 1156 MHzBoost: 1471 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 180W instead of 210W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 526.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 541% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 210W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX Vega 56 better than Quadro P5000?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,728 vs 13,026 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX Vega 56 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P5000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX Vega 56 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. Radeon RX Vega 56 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX Vega 56 is about $2,100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P5000 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (180W vs 210W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro P5000 make more sense than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Yes. Quadro P5000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (180W vs 210W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $2,499 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX Vega 56. The trade-off is that Radeon RX Vega 56 currently gives you 2.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 541%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
1080p
low252 FPS126 FPS
medium240 FPS108 FPS
high210 FPS93 FPS
ultra172 FPS64 FPS
1440p
low232 FPS102 FPS
medium195 FPS85 FPS
high162 FPS66 FPS
ultra135 FPS46 FPS
4K
low128 FPS45 FPS
medium108 FPS39 FPS
high85 FPS28 FPS
ultra77 FPS24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
1080p
low274 FPS286 FPS
medium231 FPS245 FPS
high171 FPS185 FPS
ultra138 FPS154 FPS
1440p
low180 FPS194 FPS
medium153 FPS168 FPS
high122 FPS136 FPS
ultra98 FPS109 FPS
4K
low105 FPS103 FPS
medium87 FPS87 FPS
high71 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
1080p
low573 FPS586 FPS
medium458 FPS469 FPS
high382 FPS391 FPS
ultra286 FPS293 FPS
1440p
low430 FPS440 FPS
medium344 FPS352 FPS
high286 FPS293 FPS
ultra215 FPS220 FPS
4K
low286 FPS293 FPS
medium229 FPS234 FPS
high191 FPS195 FPS
ultra143 FPS147 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
1080p
low442 FPS271 FPS
medium373 FPS236 FPS
high310 FPS201 FPS
ultra260 FPS162 FPS
1440p
low356 FPS206 FPS
medium300 FPS184 FPS
high236 FPS157 FPS
ultra190 FPS126 FPS
4K
low192 FPS123 FPS
medium151 FPS108 FPS
high136 FPS84 FPS
ultra111 FPS68 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon RX Vega 56

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1471 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
12,728
13,026+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
3584+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.54 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+18%
1471 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
224+40%
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 has 8 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 42.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5X
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
410 GB/s+42%
Bus Width
256-bit
2048-bit+700%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
DirectX
12.1
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.0
1.3+30%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
TDP
180W-14%
210W
Recommended PSU
500W-23%
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
280mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75-6%
Perf/Watt
70.7+14%
62.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 539.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon RX Vega 56
MSRP
$2499
$399-84%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
32.6+539%
Codename
GP104
Vega 10
Release
October 1 2016
August 14 2017
Ranking
#206
#199