
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 210W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 541% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 210W vs 180W.
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 210W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 541% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 210W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX Vega 56 better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P5000 make more sense than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon RX Vega 56

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,026+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.54 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+18% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 has 8 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 42.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 410 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-14% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7+14% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 539.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $399-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 32.6+539% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #206 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












