
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌257.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌257.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600X better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and Radeon PRO W6600X

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,113+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2479 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 109.3+55% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The Radeon PRO W6600X costs 72% less ($1800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon PRO W6600X offers 268.6% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $699-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 18.8+269% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #206 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












