Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

9278

G3D Mark Score

7869

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 390X is 17.9% faster than GeForce GTX 1650

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R9 390X8192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
50%
low86%
medium78%
high48%
ultra28%
1440pLow
30%
low78%
medium48%
high28%
ultra11%
4KLow
16%
low48%
medium28%
high11%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 9,278 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

GeForce GTX 16504096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
23%
low76%
medium43%
high15%
ultra5%
1440pLow
11%
low43%
medium15%
high5%
ultra5%
4KLimited
6%
low15%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 7,869 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 390X performs 17.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R9 390X and GeForce GTX 1650.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R9 390X and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:176
Vram:8192 MB
L1 Cache:704 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Boost Clock:1050 MHz
Shading Units:2816
Transistor Count:6,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:184.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):275 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.914 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Grenada
Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$429
Release Date:June 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:287
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:56
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:896 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:1485 MHz
Boost Clock:1665 MHz
Shading Units:896
Transistor Count:4,700 million
Texture Fill Rate:93.24
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.984 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU117
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:April 23 2019
Performance Ranking Position:323

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 390X and GeForce GTX 1650