
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+83.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅+83.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 390X

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 390X's 9,278 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 83.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+83% | 9,278 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+27% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+115% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+69% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 176+57% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+407% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390X has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 384 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 512-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 47.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-38% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 277mm |
| Height | 112mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+197% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 23.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 139.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-23% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+139% | 21.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Grenada |
| Release | January 12 2021 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #114 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












