G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+144.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 162.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 390X

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon R9 390X

2015

Why buy it

✅+144.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 162.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R9 390X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 9,278 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R9 390X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 144.1% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $30 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 144.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 162.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 390X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $429 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 390X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
1080p
low	177 FPS	135 FPS
medium	162 FPS	115 FPS
high	142 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	113 FPS
medium	118 FPS	96 FPS
high	101 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	39 FPS
medium	79 FPS	36 FPS
high	66 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 390X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
1080p
low	425 FPS	187 FPS
medium	359 FPS	165 FPS
high	292 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	131 FPS
medium	229 FPS	106 FPS
high	186 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	60 FPS
medium	95 FPS	50 FPS
high	77 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 390X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
1080p
low	855 FPS	418 FPS
medium	693 FPS	334 FPS
high	609 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	209 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	313 FPS
medium	527 FPS	251 FPS
high	452 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	209 FPS
medium	355 FPS	167 FPS
high	308 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	104 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 390X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
1080p
low	775 FPS	283 FPS
medium	639 FPS	247 FPS
high	558 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	204 FPS
medium	503 FPS	180 FPS
high	435 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	115 FPS
medium	322 FPS	94 FPS
high	298 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 390X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 390X

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 390X's 9,278 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 144.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
G3D Mark Score	22,651+144%	9,278
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4352+55%	2816
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+273%	5.914 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+141%	1050 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	176+29%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+523%	0.69 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 390X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	384 GB/s+33%
Bus Width	128-bit	512-bit+300%
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 52.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 390X
TDP	160W-42%	275W
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	240mm	277mm
Height	111mm	129mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	141.6+320%	33.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 163% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).