G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 145.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 145.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 1.5% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 22,651 vs 23,062 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (22,651 vs 23,062). Moving to $399 MSRP gets you and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon PRO W7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	177 FPS	223 FPS
medium	162 FPS	205 FPS
high	142 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	201 FPS
medium	118 FPS	167 FPS
high	101 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	136 FPS
medium	79 FPS	114 FPS
high	66 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	425 FPS	561 FPS
medium	359 FPS	462 FPS
high	292 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	369 FPS
medium	229 FPS	305 FPS
high	186 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	168 FPS
medium	95 FPS	138 FPS
high	77 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	91 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	855 FPS	911 FPS
medium	693 FPS	741 FPS
high	609 FPS	644 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	704 FPS
medium	527 FPS	567 FPS
high	452 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	492 FPS
medium	355 FPS	395 FPS
high	308 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	775 FPS	785 FPS
medium	639 FPS	653 FPS
high	558 FPS	591 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	622 FPS
medium	503 FPS	517 FPS
high	435 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	399 FPS
medium	322 FPS	346 FPS
high	298 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score	22,651	23,062+2%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352+42%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz	2600 MHz+3%
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	136	192+41%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+473%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	48+41%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	432 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 17.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
TDP	160W-16%	190W
Recommended PSU	550W	550W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+17%	121.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 145.9% better value.