Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 390X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 42.1% longer card at 277mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 195mm instead of 277mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 51.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 Fury X better than Radeon R9 390X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 9,278 vs 9,382 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 Fury X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 390X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 Fury X is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon R9 Fury X is about 51.3% more expensive on MSRP at $649 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 390X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 390X make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury X?
Yes. Radeon R9 390X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $429 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 Fury X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 Fury X currently gives you 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 390X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low105 FPS117 FPS
medium89 FPS104 FPS
high73 FPS85 FPS
ultra49 FPS53 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS98 FPS
medium75 FPS86 FPS
high55 FPS63 FPS
ultra36 FPS39 FPS
4K
low36 FPS34 FPS
medium32 FPS31 FPS
high20 FPS23 FPS
ultra17 FPS20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low187 FPS261 FPS
medium165 FPS219 FPS
high137 FPS173 FPS
ultra107 FPS143 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS186 FPS
medium106 FPS151 FPS
high85 FPS125 FPS
ultra65 FPS98 FPS
4K
low60 FPS101 FPS
medium50 FPS81 FPS
high45 FPS65 FPS
ultra37 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low418 FPS422 FPS
medium334 FPS338 FPS
high278 FPS281 FPS
ultra209 FPS211 FPS
1440p
low313 FPS317 FPS
medium251 FPS253 FPS
high209 FPS211 FPS
ultra157 FPS158 FPS
4K
low209 FPS211 FPS
medium167 FPS169 FPS
high139 FPS141 FPS
ultra104 FPS106 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low230 FPS197 FPS
medium199 FPS164 FPS
high160 FPS148 FPS
ultra136 FPS117 FPS
1440p
low171 FPS137 FPS
medium148 FPS118 FPS
high115 FPS107 FPS
ultra94 FPS85 FPS
4K
low98 FPS82 FPS
medium78 FPS68 FPS
high62 FPS56 FPS
ultra48 FPS42 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390X and Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 390X scores 9,278 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,278
9,382+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2816
4096+45%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.914 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1050 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
176
256+45%
L1 Cache
0.69 MB
1 MB+45%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 390X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 512-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
512 GB/s+33%
Bus Width
512-bit
4096-bit+700%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 390X draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 Fury X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390X) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 277mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
TDP
275W
275W
Recommended PSU
750W
600W-20%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
277mm
195mm
Height
129mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80
60°C-25%
Perf/Watt
33.7
34.1+1%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 390X launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. The Radeon R9 390X costs 33.9% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 390X offers 49% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$429-34%
$649
Performance per Dollar
21.6+49%
14.5
Codename
Grenada
Fiji
Release
June 18 2015
June 24 2015
Ranking
#287
#282