
Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌42.1% longer card at 277mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 277mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390X
2015Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 277mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌42.1% longer card at 277mm vs 195mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 Fury X better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 390X make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390X and Radeon R9 Fury X

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon R9 Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 390X scores 9,278 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,278 | 9,382+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 4096+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 176 | 256+45% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 1 MB+45% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 390X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 512-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 512-bit | 4096-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 390X draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 Fury X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390X) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 277mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 600W-20% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 277mm | 195mm |
| Height | 129mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.7 | 34.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 390X launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. The Radeon R9 390X costs 33.9% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 390X offers 49% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-34% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.6+49% | 14.5 |
| Codename | Grenada | Fiji |
| Release | June 18 2015 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #287 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













