
Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390X
2015RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 Mobile better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390X and RTX A1000 Mobile

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile
The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 390X scores 9,278 and the RTX A1000 Mobile reaches 9,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,278 | 9,463+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+38% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS+27% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1140 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+175% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 2 MB+190% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 390X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Mobile) — the RTX A1000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 390X draws 275W versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60W — a 128.4% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390X) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 277mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 60W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 277mm | 0mm |
| Height | 129mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.7 | 157.7+368% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390X | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | — |
| Codename | Grenada | GA107 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #287 | #277 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













