
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅110.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅110.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌120.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 116%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,995+116% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3584+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+327% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1777 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3.5 MB+298% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 181.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 360 GB/s+181% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-56% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+5% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 54.7% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-55% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+2% | 51.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













