
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌33.6% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌33.6% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5500 XT better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1536+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1757 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-40% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+66% | 63.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 33% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+33% | 39.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













