
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 34.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 580 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 34.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 34.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 580 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 34.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Radeon RX 580 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1077 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points. Launch price was $301.69.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.963 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1077 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 8,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.963 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+55% | 1077 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+56% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 580 (móvel). Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 580 (móvel)'s 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+31% | 80.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 34.9% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.9 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 51.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-35% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+51% | 34.9 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #323 | #338 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













