
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 275W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 250mm instead of 277mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌129.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 277mm vs 250mm.
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
2017Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 275W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 250mm instead of 277mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌129.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 277mm vs 250mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 390X better than GeForce GTX 1060 5GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 5GB make more sense than Radeon R9 390X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and Radeon R9 390X

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,175 | 9,278+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2816+120% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.375 TFLOPS | 5.914 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz+63% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 80 | 176+120% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 704 KB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390X has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 160-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 384 GB/s+140% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 512-bit+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 78.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-56% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-47% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 277mm |
| Height | 111mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+127% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 42% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 70.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+70% | 21.6 |
| Codename | GP106 | Grenada |
| Release | December 26 2017 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #289 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













